World Schools Debating Championships
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Recent Blog Posts
Wiki Content
Recently Changed Pages
Main Page
Judge allocation and evaluation
Adjudicators' briefing day
Ballots and the tab
Daily tasks
General organisational issues
The draw
Hosting
Hosting index
Bidding to host
General organisational issues
Budget
Sponsorship
Accommodation
Hosting timeline
Chief Adjudicator's Handbook
Schedule
Chief Adjudicator's index
History of the Chief Adjudicator and CAP
Chief Adjudication Personnel
Motions
The draw
Inviting international adjudicators
Community
Help
FANDOM
Fan Central
BETA
Games
Anime
Movies
TV
Video
Wikis
Explore Wikis
Community Central
Start a Wiki
Don't have an account?
Register
Sign In
Sign In
Register
World Schools Debating Championships
34
pages
Explore
Main Page
All Pages
Community
Interactive Maps
Recent Blog Posts
Wiki Content
Recently Changed Pages
Main Page
Judge allocation and evaluation
Adjudicators' briefing day
Ballots and the tab
Daily tasks
General organisational issues
The draw
Hosting
Hosting index
Bidding to host
General organisational issues
Budget
Sponsorship
Accommodation
Hosting timeline
Chief Adjudicator's Handbook
Schedule
Chief Adjudicator's index
History of the Chief Adjudicator and CAP
Chief Adjudication Personnel
Motions
The draw
Inviting international adjudicators
Community
Help
Editing
Final tasks
Back to page
Edit
Edit source
View history
Talk (0)
Edit Page
Final tasks
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit appears to have already been undone.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
There are a number of '''final tasks''' which fall to the Chief Adjudicator and the CAP. ==Report to World Council== You may wish, or be asked, to make a report on the adjudication side of the competition to the World Council Meeting (traditionally held on the day of the Grand Final). Your report should be a honest summary of the success of the competition and a look at any issues which require further thought. It is not a good time for extended discussion and hasty decisions, however. The Adjudication Working Group is there to help, however, and can be delegated to look at issues in further depth. ==Working with the Executive Committee== As well as your verbal report to the Council, it is helpful if you supply a report in writing to the Council's Executive Committee soon after the competition. This would include a record of the results of the debates, a summary of any important complaints you dealt with, and any other lessons learnt or recommendations for the future. Your experiences will be invaluable to future CAs. Please volunteer to serve on the Executive Committee's Adjudication Working Group for at least the following year, so that you can share detailed experiences with the other members. You are also heartily encouraged to add your thoughts to this wiki - see the [[Category:Help|Help page]] if you're not sure how! ==Thanks to judges== A small point, but a nice one β an e-mail of thanks individually to each judge can go down very well β especially the first-timers or ones from newer countries. The competition depends on the volunteered services of international judges and letting them know how much we appreciate their time (and often expense) is a good thing. ==Collating the results== Hopefully your tab system will have made it easy to collate the results, both in round-by-round form and in an overall table. Teams making the break should be ranked as follows: * Winners β 1st * Runners-up β 2nd * Highest-ranked (in the break) semi-finalist: 3rd * Lowest-ranked Semi-Finalist: 4th * Highest-ranked losing Quarter-Finalist: 5th * ...and so on until the 17th team, after which all teams are ranked accordingly to the break These results should be sent to the Convenor, and to the Executive for posting on [http://www.schoolsdebate.com www.schoolsdebate.com]. You may choose to publish the individual rankings as well β if you do, itβs recommended to limit it to the top 50, top 75 etc., as there is little benefit in naming the worst speaker at the tournament. [[Category: Chief Adjudicator's Handbook]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to the World Schools Debating Championships are considered to be released under the CC-BY-SA
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Follow on IG
TikTok
Join Fan Lab